Adjustments to spelling and presentation

Signed-off-by: Riccardo Finotello <riccardo.finotello@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
2020-10-21 15:24:18 +02:00
parent ddce7cdffc
commit cab7e6b04a
4 changed files with 11 additions and 10 deletions

View File

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ This would explain in an intuitive way why the eikonal approach to gravitational
In fact it appears that the classical and quantum scattering on an electromagnetic wave~\cite{Jackiw:1992:ElectromagneticFieldsMassless} or gravitational wave~\cite{tHooft:1987:GravitonDominanceUltrahighenergy} in \bo and \nbo are well behaved.
From this point of view the ACV approach~\cite{Soldate:1987:PartialwaveUnitarityClosedstring, Amati:1987:SuperstringCollisionsPlanckian} may be more sensible, especially when considering massive external states~\cite{Black:2012:HighEnergyString}.
Finally it seems that all issues are related with the Laplacian associated with the space-like subspace with vanishing volume at the singularity.
As a matter of fact if there is a discrete zero eigenvalue the theory develops divergences.
As a matter of fact if there is a discrete zero eigenvalue the theory automatically develops divergences.
% vim: ft=tex