Few corrections to spelling in the introductions
Signed-off-by: Riccardo Finotello <riccardo.finotello@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
		| @@ -1,7 +1,6 @@ | ||||
| \subsection{Motivation} | ||||
|  | ||||
| Unfortunately and puzzlingly the first attempts to consider space-like~\cite{Craps:2002:StringPropagationPresence} or light-like singularities~\cite{Liu:2002:StringsTimeDependentOrbifold,Liu:2002:StringsTimeDependentOrbifolds} by means of orbifold  techniques yielded divergent four points \emph{closed string} amplitudes (see \cite{Cornalba:2004:TimedependentOrbifoldsString,Craps:2006:BigBangModels} for reviews). | ||||
|  | ||||
| The first attempts to consider space-like~\cite{Craps:2002:StringPropagationPresence} or light-like singularities~\cite{Liu:2002:StringsTimeDependentOrbifold,Liu:2002:StringsTimeDependentOrbifolds} by means of orbifold  techniques yielded divergent four points \emph{closed string} amplitudes (see \cite{Cornalba:2004:TimedependentOrbifoldsString,Craps:2006:BigBangModels} for reviews). | ||||
| These singularities are commonly assumed to be connected to a large backreaction of the incoming matter into the singularity due to the exchange of a single graviton~\cite{Berkooz:2003:CommentsCosmologicalSingularities,Horowitz:2002:InstabilitySpacelikeNull}. | ||||
| This claim was already questioned in the literature where the $O$-plane orbifold was constructed. | ||||
| This orbifold should in fact be stable against the gravitational collapse but it exhibits divergences in the amplitudes (see the discussion in \cite{Cornalba:2004:TimedependentOrbifoldsString}). | ||||
|   | ||||
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user