Adjustments to intros and conclusions
Signed-off-by: Riccardo Finotello <riccardo.finotello@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
|
||||
In the previous analysis it seems that string theory cannot do better than field theory when the latter does not exist, at least at the perturbative level where one deals with particles.
|
||||
Moreover when spacetime becomes singular, the string massive modes are not anymore spectators.
|
||||
From the previous analysis it seems that string theory cannot do better than field theory when the latter does not exist, at least at the perturbative level where one deals with particles.
|
||||
Moreover when spacetime becomes singular the string massive modes are not spectators anymore.
|
||||
Everything seems to suggest that issues with spacetime singularities are hidden into contact terms and interactions with massive states.
|
||||
This would explain in an intuitive way why the eikonal approach to gravitational scattering works well: the eikonal is indeed concerned with three point massless interactions.
|
||||
This would explain in an intuitive way why the eikonal approach to gravitational scattering works well: it is indeed concerned with three point massless interactions.
|
||||
In fact it appears that the classical and quantum scattering on an electromagnetic wave~\cite{Jackiw:1992:ElectromagneticFieldsMassless} or gravitational wave~\cite{tHooft:1987:GravitonDominanceUltrahighenergy} in \bo and \nbo are well behaved.
|
||||
From this point of view the ACV approach~\cite{Soldate:1987:PartialwaveUnitarityClosedstring,Amati:1987:SuperstringCollisionsPlanckian} may be more sensible, especially when considering massive external states~\cite{Black:2012:HighEnergyString}.
|
||||
From this point of view the ACV approach~\cite{Soldate:1987:PartialwaveUnitarityClosedstring, Amati:1987:SuperstringCollisionsPlanckian} may be more sensible, especially when considering massive external states~\cite{Black:2012:HighEnergyString}.
|
||||
Finally it seems that all issues are related with the Laplacian associated with the space-like subspace with vanishing volume at the singularity.
|
||||
If there is a discrete zero eigenvalue the theory develops divergences.
|
||||
As a matter of fact if there is a discrete zero eigenvalue the theory develops divergences.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
% vim: ft=tex
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ In what follows we show a direct computation showing that the presence of the di
|
||||
|
||||
Unnoticed in the Null Boost Orbifold (\nbo) \cite{Liu:2002:StringsTimeDependentOrbifold}, even the four \emph{open string} tachyons amplitude is divergent.
|
||||
Since we are working at tree level gravity is not an issue.
|
||||
In fact in Equation (6.16) of \cite{Liu:2002:StringsTimeDependentOrbifold} the four tachyons amplitude in the divergent region reads
|
||||
In fact in~\cite{Liu:2002:StringsTimeDependentOrbifold} the four tachyons amplitude in the divergent region reads
|
||||
\begin{equation}
|
||||
A_4 \sim \int\limits_{q \sim \infty} \frac{\dd{q}}{\abs{q}} \ccA( q )
|
||||
\end{equation}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,14 +1,14 @@
|
||||
In the previous part we mainly focused on the mathematical tools needed to compute amplitudes in a phenomenologically valid string theory framework of particle physics.
|
||||
This ultimately led to the introduction of intersecting D-branes and point-like defects to perform the calculation of correlation functions involving twist and spin fields, inevitably necessary fields when considering chiral matter fields.
|
||||
In the previous part we mainly focused on the mathematical tools needed to compute amplitudes in a (semi-)phenomenologically viable string theory framework of particle physics.
|
||||
This ultimately led to the introduction of intersecting D-branes and point-like defects to perform the calculation of correlation functions involving twist and spin fields, inevitably necessary when considering chiral matter fields.
|
||||
While this is indeed a good starting point to build an entire string phenomenology, the theory cannot be limited to the study of particle physics models.
|
||||
String Theory is in fact considered to be one of the candidate theories for the description of quantum gravity alongside the nuclear interactions.
|
||||
String theory is in fact considered to be one of the candidate theories for the description of quantum gravity alongside the nuclear interactions.
|
||||
As a \emph{theory of everything} it is therefore fascinating to analyse cosmological implications as seen from its description.
|
||||
In this part of the thesis we focus on the implications of the string theory when considering for instance the Big Bang singularity, or, broadly speaking, singularities which exist in one point in time.\footnotemark{}
|
||||
In this part of the thesis we focus on the implications of the string theory when considering for instance the Big Bang singularity, or, broadly speaking, singularities which exist in one point in time (i.e.\ space-like).\footnotemark{}
|
||||
\footnotetext{%
|
||||
They are intended as distinct from time-like singularities such as black holes which are present for extended periods of time in one spatial point.
|
||||
The space-like singularities we consider are the opposite: they exist in a given instant.
|
||||
The space-like singularities we consider are the opposite: they exist in a given instant in time but could in principle cover an extended hypersurface in space.
|
||||
}
|
||||
Among the different possible descriptions of such space-like singularities~\cite{Berkooz:2007:ShortReviewTime} we concentrate on string theory solutions on time-dependent orbifolds.
|
||||
Among the different possible descriptions of such space-like singularities~\cite{Berkooz:2007:ShortReviewTime} we concentrate on string theory solutions on time-dependent orbifolds as they represent the simplest models describing such phenomena.
|
||||
Before delving into the subject we briefly present their definition and the reason behind their relevance in what follows~\cite{CaramelloJr:2019:IntroductionOrbifolds,Bachas:2002:NullBraneIntersections,Bachas:2003:RelativisticStringPulse}.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -16,9 +16,9 @@ Before delving into the subject we briefly present their definition and the reas
|
||||
|
||||
First of all we recall the formal definition of orbifold to better introduce the idea of a manifold locally isomorphic to a quotient space.
|
||||
Let therefore $M$ be a topological space and $G$ a group with an action $\ccG: G \times M \to M$ defined by $\ccG(g,\, p) = g p$ for $g \in G$ and $p \in M$.
|
||||
Then the \emph{isotropy subgroup} (or \emph{stabiliser}) of $p \in M$ is $G_p = \qty{ g \in G \mid g p = p }$ such that $G_{gp} = g\, G_p\, g^{-1}$.
|
||||
Then the \emph{isotropy subgroup} (or \emph{stabiliser}) of $p \in M$ is $G_p = \qty{ g \in G \mid g p = p }$ such that $G_{gp} = g^{-1}\, G_p\, g$.
|
||||
Given an element $p \in M$ its \emph{orbit} is $Gp = \qty{ gp \in M \mid g \in G }$.
|
||||
The action of the group is said \emph{transitive} if $Gp = M$ and \emph{effective} if its $\ker{\ccG} = \qty{ \1 }$.
|
||||
The action of the group is said \emph{transitive} if $Gp = M$ and \emph{effective} if its kernel is trivial, i.e.\ $\ker{\ccG} = \qty{ \1 }$.
|
||||
The \emph{orbit space} $M / G$ is the set of equivalence classes given by the orbital partitions and inherits the quotient topology from $M$.
|
||||
|
||||
Let now $M$ be a manifold and $G$ a Lie group acting continuously and transitively on $M$.
|
||||
@@ -29,8 +29,8 @@ For every point $p \in M$ we can define a continuous bijection $\lambda_p \colon
|
||||
}
|
||||
Such map is a diffeomorphism if $M$ and $G$ are locally compact spaces and $M / G$ is in turn a manifold itself.
|
||||
If $G$ is a discrete or finite group the action is called \emph{properly discontinuous}, that is for every $U \subset M$ then $\qty{ g \in G \mid U \cap g U \neq \emptyset }$ is finite.
|
||||
The definition of orbifold intuitively includes quotient manifolds such as $M / G$: analogously to manifold which are locally Euclidean, in the broad sense orbifolds are locally modelled by quotients with actions given by finite groups.
|
||||
|
||||
The definition of orbifold intuitively includes quotient manifolds such as $M / G$: analogously to manifold which are locally Euclidean, in the broad sense orbifolds are locally modelled by quotients with actions given by finite groups.
|
||||
An \emph{orbifold chart} $\qty( \tildeU,\, G,\, \phi )$ of dimension $n \in \N$ for an open subset $U \in M$ is made of:
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item a connected open subset $\tildeU \subset \R^n$,
|
||||
@@ -51,12 +51,13 @@ The $n$-dimensional \emph{orbifold} $\ccO$ is finally defined as a paracompact H
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Orbifolds and Strings}
|
||||
\subsubsection{Orbifolds and Strings}
|
||||
|
||||
In string theory the notion of orbifold has a more stringent characterisation with respect to pure mathematics.
|
||||
Differently from the general definition, orbifolds in physics usually appear as a global orbit space $M / G$ where $M$ is a manifold and $G$ the group of its isometries, often leading to the presence of \emph{fixed points} (i.e.\ points in the manifold which are left invariant by the action of $G$) where singularities emerge due to the presence of additional degrees of freedom given by \emph{twisted states} of the string~\cite{Dixon:1985:StringsOrbifolds,Dixon:1986:StringsOrbifoldsII}.
|
||||
They are commonly introduced as singular limits of \cy manifolds~\cite{Candelas:1985:VacuumConfigurationsSuperstrings}, which in turn can be recovered using algebraic geometry to smoothen the singular points.
|
||||
However they can also be used to model peculiar time-dependent backgrounds~\cite{Horowitz:1991:SingularStringSolutions,Khoury:2002:BigCrunchBig,Figueroa-OFarrill:2001:GeneralisedSupersymmetricFluxbranes,Cornalba:2002:NewCosmologicalScenario,Cornalba:2004:TimedependentOrbifoldsString,Craps:2006:BigBangModels,Bachas:2002:NullBraneIntersections,Bachas:2003:RelativisticStringPulse}.
|
||||
They are in fact good toy models to study Big Bang scenarios in string theory and we focus specifically on the study of such cosmological singularity in the framework of string theory.
|
||||
They are in fact good toy models to study Big Bang scenarios in string theory.
|
||||
We focus specifically on the study of such cosmological singularities in the framework of string theory defined on time-dependent orbifolds.
|
||||
|
||||
% vim: ft=tex
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user