Stop adding papers
Signed-off-by: Riccardo Finotello <riccardo.finotello@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -2552,9 +2552,6 @@ A visual reference can be found in~\Cref{fig:branes_at_angles}.
|
||||
For the \SU{2} case we can use a rotation to map $(f_{(t-1)} - f_{(t)})^i$ to the form $\norm{f_{(t-1)} - f_{(t)}} \delta^i_1$.
|
||||
Each term of the action can be interpreted again as an area of a triangle where the distance between the interaction points is the base.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\subsubsection{Generalisation and Summary}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}[tbp]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\def\svgwidth{0.35\textwidth}
|
||||
@@ -2566,16 +2563,12 @@ Each term of the action can be interpreted again as an area of a triangle where
|
||||
\label{fig:brane3d}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
\subsubsection{General Case and Intuitive Explanation}
|
||||
|
||||
In the general case there does not seem to be any possible way of computing the action~\eqref{eq:action_with_imaginary_part} in term of the global data.
|
||||
Most probably the value of the action is larger than in the holomorphic case since the string is no longer confined to a plane.
|
||||
Given the nature of the rotation its worldsheet has to bend in order to be attached to the D-brane as pictorially shown in~\Cref{fig:brane3d} in the case of a $3$-dimensional space.
|
||||
The general case we considered then differs from the known factorized case by an additional contribution in the on-shell action which can be intuitively understood as a small ``bump'' of the string worldsheet in proximity of the boundary.
|
||||
|
||||
We thus showed that the specific geometry of the intersecting D-branes leads to different results when computing the value of the classical action, that is the leading contribution to the Yukawa couplings in string theory.
|
||||
In particular in the Abelian case the value of the action is exactly the area formed by the intersecting D-branes in the $\R^2$ plane, i.e.\ the string worldsheet is completely contained in the polygon on the plane.
|
||||
The difference between the \SO{4} case and \SU{2} is more subtle as in the latter there are complex coordinates in $\R^4$ for which the classical string solution is holomorphic in the upper half plane.
|
||||
In the generic case presented so far this is in general no longer true.
|
||||
The reason can probably be traced back to supersymmetry, even though we only dealt with the bosonic string.
|
||||
In fact when considering \SU{2} rotated D-branes part of the spacetime supersymmetry is preserved, while this is not the case for \SO{4} rotations.
|
||||
|
||||
% vim: ft=tex
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user