Adjustments to intros and conclusions
Signed-off-by: Riccardo Finotello <riccardo.finotello@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -3,25 +3,25 @@
|
||||
As seen in the previous sections, the study of viable phenomenological models in string theory involves the analysis of the properties of systems of D-branes.
|
||||
The inclusion of the physical requirements deeply constrains the possible scenarios.
|
||||
In particular the chiral spectrum of the \sm acts as a strong restriction on the possible setup.
|
||||
In this section we study models based on \emph{intersecting branes}, which represent a relevant class of such models with interacting chiral matter.
|
||||
In this section we study \emph{intersecting D-branes}, which represent a relevant class of models with interacting chiral matter.
|
||||
We focus on the development of technical tools for the computation of Yukawa interactions for D-branes at angles~\cite{Chamoun:2004:FermionMassesMixing,Cremades:2003:YukawaCouplingsIntersecting,Cvetic:2010:BranesInstantonsIntersecting,Abel:2007:RealisticYukawaCouplings,Chen:2008:RealisticWorldIntersecting,Chen:2008:RealisticYukawaTextures,Abel:2005:OneloopYukawasIntersecting}.
|
||||
The fermion--boson couplings and the study of flavour changing neutral currents~\cite{Abel:2003:FlavourChangingNeutral} are keys to the validity of the models.
|
||||
These and many other computations require the ability to calculate correlation functions of (excited) twist and (excited) spin fields.
|
||||
Furthermore these and many other computations require the ability to calculate correlation functions of (excited) twist and (excited) spin fields.
|
||||
The goal of the section is therefore to address such challenges in specific scenarios.
|
||||
|
||||
The computation of the correlation functions of Abelian twist fields can be found in literature and plays a role in many scenarios, such as magnetic branes with commuting magnetic fluxes~\cite{Angelantonj:2000:TypeIStringsMagnetised,Bertolini:2006:BraneWorldEffective,Bianchi:2005:OpenStoryMagnetic,Pesando:2010:OpenClosedString,Forste:2018:YukawaCouplingsMagnetized}, strings in gravitational wave background~\cite{Kiritsis:1994:StringPropagationGravitational,DAppollonio:2003:StringInteractionsGravitational,Berkooz:2004:ClosedStringsMisner,DAppollonio:2005:DbranesBCFTHppwave}, bound states of D-branes~\cite{Gava:1997:BoundStatesBranes,Duo:2007:NewTwistField,David:2000:TachyonCondensationD0} and tachyon condensation in Superstring Field Theory~\cite{David:2000:TachyonCondensationD0,David:2001:TachyonCondensationUsing,David:2002:ClosedStringTachyon,Hashimoto:2003:RecombinationIntersectingDbranes}.
|
||||
The computation of the correlation functions of Abelian twist fields can be found in literature and plays a role in many scenarios such as magnetic branes with commuting magnetic fluxes~\cite{Angelantonj:2000:TypeIStringsMagnetised,Bertolini:2006:BraneWorldEffective,Bianchi:2005:OpenStoryMagnetic,Pesando:2010:OpenClosedString,Forste:2018:YukawaCouplingsMagnetized}, strings in gravitational wave background~\cite{Kiritsis:1994:StringPropagationGravitational,DAppollonio:2003:StringInteractionsGravitational,Berkooz:2004:ClosedStringsMisner,DAppollonio:2005:DbranesBCFTHppwave}, bound states of D-branes~\cite{Gava:1997:BoundStatesBranes,Duo:2007:NewTwistField,David:2000:TachyonCondensationD0} and tachyon condensation in Superstring Field Theory~\cite{David:2000:TachyonCondensationD0,David:2001:TachyonCondensationUsing,David:2002:ClosedStringTachyon,Hashimoto:2003:RecombinationIntersectingDbranes}.
|
||||
A similar analysis can be extended to excited twist fields even though they are more subtle to treat and hide more delicate aspects~\cite{Burwick:1991:GeneralYukawaCouplings,Stieberger:1992:YukawaCouplingsBosonic,Erler:1993:HigherTwistedSector,Anastasopoulos:2011:ClosedstringTwistfieldCorrelators,Anastasopoulos:2012:LightStringyStates,Anastasopoulos:2013:ThreeFourpointCorrelators}.
|
||||
Results were however found starting from dual models up to modern interpretations of string theory~\cite{Sciuto:1969:GeneralVertexFunction,DellaSelva:1970:SimpleExpressionSciuto}.
|
||||
Results were however found starting from dual models~\cite{Sciuto:1969:GeneralVertexFunction,DellaSelva:1970:SimpleExpressionSciuto} up to modern interpretations of string theory.
|
||||
Correlation functions involving arbitrary numbers of plain and excited twist fields were more recently studied~\cite{Pesando:2014:CorrelatorsArbitraryUntwisted,Pesando:2012:GreenFunctionsTwist,Pesando:2011:GeneratingFunctionAmplitudes} blending the CFT techniques with the path integral approach and the canonical quantization~\cite{Pesando:2008:MultibranesBoundaryStates,DiVecchia:2007:WrappedMagnetizedBranes,Pesando:2011:StringsArbitraryConstant,DiVecchia:2011:OpenStringsSystem,Pesando:2013:LightConeQuantization}.
|
||||
|
||||
We consider D6-branes intersecting at angles in the case of non Abelian relative rotations presenting non Abelian twist fields at the intersections.
|
||||
We try to understand subtleties and technical issues arising from a scenario which has been studied only in the formulation of non Abelian orbifolds \cite{Inoue:1987:NonAbelianOrbifolds,Inoue:1990:StringInteractionsNonAbelian,Gato:1990:VertexOperatorsNonabelian,Frampton:2001:ClassificationConformalityModels} and for D-branes relative \SU{2} rotations~\cite{Pesando:2016:FullyStringyComputation}.
|
||||
We try to understand subtleties and technical issues arising from a scenario which has been studied only in the formulation of non Abelian orbifolds \cite{Inoue:1987:NonAbelianOrbifolds,Inoue:1990:StringInteractionsNonAbelian,Gato:1990:VertexOperatorsNonabelian,Frampton:2001:ClassificationConformalityModels} and for relative \SU{2} rotations of the D-branes ~\cite{Pesando:2016:FullyStringyComputation}.
|
||||
In this configuration we study three D6-branes in $10$-dimensional Minkowski space $\ccM^{1,9}$ with an internal space of the form $\R^4 \times \R^2$ before the compactification.
|
||||
The D-branes are embedded as lines in $\R^2$ and as two-dimensional surfaces inside $\R^4$.
|
||||
We focus on the relative rotations which characterise each D-brane in $\R^4$ with respect to the others.
|
||||
In total generality, they are non commuting \SO{4} matrices.
|
||||
We study the classical solution of the bosonic string which dominates the behaviour of the correlator of twist fields.
|
||||
Using the path integral approach we can in fact separate the classical contribution from the quantum fluctuations and write the correlators of $N_B$ twist fields $\sigma_{\rM_{(t)}}( x_{(t)} )$ as:\footnotemark{}
|
||||
Using the path integral approach we can in fact separate the classical contribution from the quantum fluctuations and write the correlators of $N_B$ twist fields $\sigma_{\rM_{(t)}}\qty( x_{(t)} )$ as:\footnotemark{}
|
||||
\footnotetext{%
|
||||
Ultimately $N_B = 3$ in our case.
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ Their calculations requires the correlator of four twist fields which in turn re
|
||||
We therefore study the boundary conditions for the open string describing the D-branes embedded in $\R^4$.
|
||||
In particular we first address the issue connected to the global description of the embedding of the D-branes.
|
||||
In conformal coordinates we rephrase such problem into the study of the monodromies acquired by the string coordinates.
|
||||
These additional phase factors can then be specialised to \SO{4}, which can be studied in spinor representation as a double copy of \SU{2}.
|
||||
These additional phase factors can then be specialised to \SO{4} and be studied in spinor representation as a tensor product of \SU{2} elements.
|
||||
We thus recast the issue of finding the solution as $4$-dimensional real vector to a tensor product of two solutions in the fundamental representation of \SU{2}.
|
||||
We then see that these solutions are well represented by hypergeometric functions, up to integer factors.
|
||||
Physical requirements finally restrict the number of possible solutions.
|
||||
@@ -2568,7 +2568,7 @@ Each term of the action can be interpreted again as an area of a triangle where
|
||||
In the general case there does not seem to be any possible way of computing the action~\eqref{eq:action_with_imaginary_part} in term of the global data.
|
||||
Most probably the value of the action is larger than in the holomorphic case since the string is no longer confined to a plane.
|
||||
Given the nature of the rotation its worldsheet has to bend in order to be attached to the D-brane as pictorially shown in~\Cref{fig:brane3d} in the case of a $3$-dimensional space.
|
||||
The general case we considered then differs from the known factorized case by an additional contribution in the on-shell action which can be intuitively understood as a small ``bump'' of the string worldsheet in proximity of the boundary.
|
||||
The general case we considered then differs from the known factorised case by an additional contribution in the on-shell action which can be intuitively understood as a small ``bump'' of the string worldsheet in proximity of the boundary.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
% vim: ft=tex
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user